File:SpeakerGingrich.jpg

Here’s a recent article quoting the Newtster Newt Gingrich as he went campaigning for the 2012 Presidential Election:

“I have two grandchildren: Maggie is 11; Robert is 9,” Gingrich said at Cornerstone Church here. “I am convinced that if we do not decisively win the struggle over the nature of America, by the time they’re my age they will be in a secular atheist country, potentially one dominated by radical Islamists and with no understanding of what it once meant to be an American.”

I don’t quite get the message. Is Newt Gingrich suggesting that the radical Islamists and secular atheists are teaming up to take over America?  Now why Gingrich thinks atheists will join Allah-following Islamists in taking over America, well that’s just weird out of the box thinking that only the Newt can do. 7-11′s, gas stations and Starbucks aside, I just don’t see the Islamist-Atheist demographic increasing their numbers to the point of taking over the country. Is there some conspiracy whereby they’re going to inter-marry and give birth to little Islamic-Atheists?  Could such a person even exist outside Salman Rushdie? And if you follow Gingrich’s thinking, does being Islamic or an atheist automatically preclude you from being an American?  At least he showed a little restraint in his flamboyant commentary;  he didn’t throw homosexuals into the mix but then again he probably assumes all atheists to be homosexual!

Frankly, hasn’t Gingrich read the recent census reports regarding the rise of the Hispanic population within the US mainland?  Really, if you’re Protestant your biggest fear should be being swamped by the waves of Latino Catholic immigrants and not by some unholy alliance between radical Islamists and Atheists. Besides, Atheists adopting Sharia law, that will be a cold day in hell, right?

Seems this hyperbolic insight flowed as Newt Gingrich was addressing CornerStone Church, a megachurch in San Antonio, Texas, led by the Rev. John Hagee, an influential leader among American evangelicals. You might recall Hagee’s endorsement of then-presidential candidate John McCain in 2008 being plagued by instant controversy. McCain rejected the endorsement because of comments Hagee had made regarding the Holocaust, claims that Adolf Hitler had been fulfilling God’s will by hastening the return of the Jews to Israel, all of course in accordance with biblical prophecy. What crapola! Hitler as an instrument of god! Doesn’t matter; Republicans love to pander to this nutty crowd!

Needless to say, the Newt Gingrich was strangely quiet about his own martial indiscretions and numerous divorces that have made his appeal to the Bible Belt, well just a little less than appealing.  His extra-marital affairs during the cancer illness of his first ex-wife were particularly insensitive and smarmy to many onlookers so it remains to be seen if he can attract a following by pandering to the Bible-Belt.

In his own defense I love this quote from the Newtster:  “There’s no question at times in my life, partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked too hard and things happened in my life that were not appropriate.” So that’s what causes infidelity: working too hard for one’s country?  Damn it, with all of the ongoing divorce there must be a lot of patriots out there in the hinterlands. Well, something was hard but not necessarily the work and how you can say this with a straight face is beyond me.  In any case, Gingrich will convert them all even if it means taking on the unholy alliance of Islamic-Atheist Un-Americans!

That said, with the Newt clearly on his game and with Donald Trump sounding more and more like a closet Birther, this presidential campaign has all the earmarks of being just as entertaining as the last one!  And here’s one prediction you can bank on, as the economy goes so does Obama chances for re-election!


Tagged with:
 

Sorry, Catholic Church says Male-Only Priesthood

From the CNN belief blog  CNN’s Richard Allen Greene and Melissa Gray contributed to this report: Catholic Church defends male-only priesthood

Barring women from being Catholic priests is not the result of sexism 2,000 years ago, it’s because women cannot fulfill a basic function of the priesthood, “standing in the place of Jesus,” a leading British Catholic thinker argued Monday.

“This teaching is not at all a judgment on women’s abilities or rights. It says something about the specific role of the priest in Catholic understanding – which is to represent Jesus, to stand in his place,” argued Father Stephen Wang in a statement sent out by the Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales.

The bottom line is that Jesus chose 12 men – and no women – to be his apostles, Wang argues.

The choice was “deliberate and significant, not just for that first period of history, but for every age,” Wang says.

Men and women are equal in Christianity, he continues, but “this does not mean that our sexual identity as men and women is interchangeable. Gender is not just an accident.”

He compared the role of a priest to that of an actor playing King Arthur or British soccer star Wayne Rooney in a movie.

“No one would be surprised if I said I wanted a male actor to play the lead,” he said, admitting the analogy was “weak.”

But, he said, “it shouldn’t surprise us if we expect a man to stand ‘in the person of Christ’ as a priest, to represent Jesus in his humanity – a humanity that is not sexually neutral.”

Sorry Father Wang, it’s hard to believe that any god would be so personally vested in penises and testicles but apparently the Catholic Church clergy thinks so. Think it has anything to do with the fact that the Catholic clergy all sport penises?   Nothing like keeping the good old boy’s club alive, huh?  It’s one of those backwards-facing memes that have become so ingrained in the church culture that it’s hard to think otherwise if you are a member of the clergy.  You know sort of like the earth is at the center of the universe and is only 6,000 years old yet this bit of chauvinism is going to be harder to disprove.  Frankly, I don’t know how you can argue this nonsense with a straight face.

Upon reflection, this entire thought process does make sense because religion has always been about male domination and the control of other subordinate males.  Frankly, it was never about personal salvation spirituality but it was more important in defining the “us versus them” mentality.  Moreover; if you can control the males and the attached females come along for the ride and let’s face it, no man is into following a female religious leader.  Why?  Because regressive Mid-Eastern rationalizations, and I’m sorry but Christianity, Islam and Judaism are all cut from the same bolt of cloth, not only denies the validity of the women in our life but the universality of all life and its very existence in the cosmos.  Women are subservient to men, I mean come on it’s god’s will, right?

What’s so weird about all these mid-east religions is how firmly rooted they are in the first millennium.  And it’s not just the mid-east religions that are afflicted with is myopic male vision of the universe.  Even a religion as enlightened as Buddhism has the male firmly ensconced in the role of the priest and the women as their hand-maiden nuns. It’s as if we didn’t know that there are other worlds out there sporting unknown life forms living out an existence totally independent of our own for billions of years. Why would we? Because we know on those other planets all of the alien spiritual authorities sport penises and testicles; let’s face it, maleness rules the universe! You’re right, I automatically assume that there is other life in the universe, and I assume that some of it is intelligent; in fact, I only question  the presence of intelligent life here on earth.

Now don’t get me wrong I am fond of my own male genitalia and I really do enjoy the yin and yang of the male/female dynamic.  However; I don’t feel my male organs have been the driving force in my own evolving personal spirituality. Honestly, I would argue quite the opposite and the recent Catholic Church scandals bears witness to my wayward reasoning! Yeah, I’m going to hell for thinking aloud this blasphemy but fortunately for me I never believed in the fairy tale nonsense of heaven and hell.  Besides, the sexism of all major religions is a firm rejoinder to me that all religions are the province of earth-bound men and not necessarily that of the gods. Frankly, it would be more than fitting if we get the afterlife we envisioned during our lifetime; with penises or without!

Erik John Bertel

Authors of Flores Girl: The Children God Forgot

With over 200,000 downloads Flores Girl:The Children God Forgot is now available as a free ebook novel on the iPhone!